Thursday 3 November 2011

Androgynous Fashion



  Sarah Jessica Parker


Olivia Palermo


 Rachel Bilson


Evan Rachel Wood


Alexa Chung


Is it important to consider gender in relation to the history and practice of fashion photography?

“The new darling of the catwalk is a man. The Serbian-born model of female beauty is an androgynous lad of 19 from Melbourne.
With his long blond hair, huge almond-shaped eyes, Angelina Jolie lips and a body as flat as a surfboard, Andrej Pejic is the toast of women’s high fashion the world over. A beautiful teenager with the face of a girl and the body of a boy, the perfect expression of beauty for these top fashion designers”(Platell 2011).




Gender is the most significant aspect of social identity. With reference to transgendered models I will explain the evolution of gender in modernist society and its inextricable link to fashion photography. With reference to the historical depiction of femininity in the fashion industry I will show how the practice of fashion photography changed gender roles in society.  For the purpose of my argument I will use the case of transgender model Andrej Pejic. 


Pejic demonstrates the dissolution of gender norms and his case explores gender difference. How these differences have been presented by the practice of fashion photography is a poignant issue for the industry as a whole. For the purpose of this essay I will also explain how gender differences presented in fashion media significant impact of Femininity photography in normative society

Fashion and representations of gender are significant symbols of identity. Fashion photography has evolved throughout history concurrent with the reforms in women’s gender roles.  During the 19th Century images of femininity coincided with the dominant misconceptions of the time period. Women were sexually repressed and images of conservative upper class women depicted and reinforced this image. A basic premise of the dominant ideology concerning women was the belief in fixed gender identities and in the existence of major differences between men and women (Crane, 2000:page 16). Ideologies associated with the female gender included: nurturing, weak and dependant. Due to the social structures at the time, women were less independent than their male counterparts, hence presentations of restrictive women’s fashions.  Clothing in the 1900’s was notably heavy and took a great deal of time and effort to maneuver. Even a woman’s undergarments were restricted and earned the name ‘stays’.  Fashion photography reflected the styles and showed off the huge headpieces, restricting corsets, large skirts in order to hide ones legs and therefore cover up feminine sexuality. Diana Crane theorizes that gender is communicated through social performances including certain styles of dress, accessories makeup but the self is not inherently masculine or feminine. (Crane, 2000: page 17)


Towards the end of the twentieth Century, Photographers began to reject ‘claustrophobic feminity’. Helmut Newton and Ellen Von Unwerth are two notable photographers who were at the forefront of presenting this new identity rejecting the oppressive roles of gender difference. Newton experimented with masculine themes whilst Unwerth during the mid 80’s played with fashion and sexuality in a far less socially restrictive period. It was this period in the late twentieth century that nineteenth century notions of fixed gender identities and intolerance of gender ambiguity were gradually disappearing (Crane, 2000:page 17).
Women’s liberation brought with it its own sets of differences to the ideals and norms of gender from the 19th century. It could be determined women’s liberation movements in the 1970’s promulgated new gender roles emphasizing power for women. As Newton presented in his work, women began to consume masculine styles and documentation in the form of fashion photography helped to spread a new androgynous style of shoulder pads and pant suits. “Women were often made masculine either in dress or behavior, featured with boyish haircuts, trousers, tightly rolled black umbrella and exaggerated shoulders. Entwistle notes the emphasis on pushing the limits of gender masquerade in fashion photography (Butler).


Andre Pejic is an undeniable force for change in the movement toward the fostering of androgyny in fashion photography. Androgyny in fashion photography has become more frequent after pop culture figures paving the way. Pejic claims “he has always been comfortable playing both roles and even finds it sometimes difficult to get in touch with his masculine side. He told the Telegraph: 'I’m comfortable doing both” (Pejic as cited by Harding, 2011). Kylie Minogue and Lady Gaga are two such artists who also play on androgynous culture. By including transgender subcultures and homosexual communities into the realm modern identity, gender differences are becoming marketable assets in the fashion industry. Crane states advertisers have been forced to incorporate oppositional elements into their advertising in order to hold the attention of increasingly sophisticated consumers. Diverse images in fashion magazines associated with clothing styles for women’s identities I the late twentieth century. (Crane, 2000: page 19). Differences in sexual orientation, particularly androgynous figures have significant impact on modernist social culture. In the 2011 edition of FHM’s 100 sexiest women of 2011 the controversial transgender model Andrej Pejic was voted in at number 98 (Sweney, 2011)

Fashion photography is a dominating force in representing and disseminating gender norms. According to Thompson and Haytko (1997:16), consumers use “fashion discourses to forge self defining social distinctions and boundaries to construct narratives of personal history to interpret the interpersonal dynamics of their social spheres, to understand their relationship to consumer cultures, and to transform and… contest conventional social categories (Crane, 2000: 13). While this may be true theorist have undertaken various research to uncover who is directing the future of the fashion industry and if said individuals have the right to determine gender roles for women in the twenty-first century. It can be determined that as these cultures have arisen from media exposure that fashion photographers are not only documenting these changes but in turn encouraging them as well.

Platell attributes to redeveloped gender roles for women to an elite homosexual community of designers. She critiques the trend towards diminished femininity in fashion models has been a common practice in the twenty-first century and states “it was not a big step for them to start replacing women with teenage boys”(Platell, 2011). This image not only creates controversy for feminine hegemony, masculinity over history is portrayed with power, strength and heterosexuality.


The idea that female fashion models lack femininity has been repetitive issue in the industry. Until the issue of transgender models, whose use should be heavily criticised for unrealistically modeling clothes for the everyday woman, the headlines shamed size zero models. Fashion photography can have a significant impact on a social and cultural level. Producing Gender images in fashion photography can set unattainable standards and emphasize the void between fashion photography and the identity of the modern woman. Gender codes defined by Fashion photography have been found to stimulate a definitive gap between the body images of young women in general and that idealized in the media. This was established by a study comparing the anthropometric measurements of the idealized female body in media targeted to men, women, or mixed gender audiences (Byrd-Benner, et all, 2003).

In conclusion it is evident gender norms presented in fashion media in the twenty first century have had a significant impact on the feminine identity. In discussing the use of transgender models in feminine projects we can locate the significance of gender to fashion photography. Fashion photography and gender work in duality to change the idea and portrayal of identity.
There is extensive debate over the fashion industries disconnectedness from feminine identity in its entirety. In the early 19th century females were too feminine and now they are considered to masculine. However it is certain that changed hegemonic rules of femininity and masculinity have caused a social and cultural shift in the process of identity construction. Gender differences have evidently expanded to include a multiplicity of sexual sub cultures in fashion photography.


Related Articles found on Androgynous fashion


Reference list

BYRD-BREDBENNER, J.MURRAY . 2003. Topics in Clinical Nutrition:
April 2003 - Volume 18 - Issue 2 - p 117–129. Innovations in Practice A Comparison of the Anthropometric Measurements of Idealized Female Body Images in Media Directed to Men, Women, and Mixed Gender Audiences.
ByrdBredbenner, Carol PhD, RD, FADA; Murray, Jessica.

T.BUTLER The Counterfeit Body: Fashion Photography and the Deceptions of Femininity, Sexuality, Authenticity and Self in the 1950s, 60s and 70s [Page 6]. Accessed online on the 1st June 2011 http://www.daylightonline.com/thecounterfeitbody6.htm

D.CRANE. 2000. Fashion and its social agendas: class, gender, and identity in clothing. University of Chicago Press. pages 13-18.
Accessed online on the via Google Scholar on the 31st June 2011 via

E.HARDING. 2011.  'I would love to do Playboy': Meet the MALE womenswear model causing a stir in the fashion industry. Mail Online Article posted on the 24th February 2011
Accessed online on the 31st June 2011 via-

D.CRANE. 2000. Fashion and its social agendas: class, gender, and identity in clothing. University of Chicago Press. pages 13-18.
Accessed online on the via Google Scholar on the 31st June 2011 via

A.PLATELL . 2011. ‘Fashion's ultimate insult to women’: The latest way of demeaning real women is a male model dressed as a girl. Daily Mail article posted on the 25th February 2011 accessed online on the 31st of June 2011 via-

M.SWENEY. 2011 FHM apologises after male model appears in sexiest women list. Guardian.co.uk article posted on the 1 June 2011 accessed online on the 1st June 2011 via
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/01/fhm-andrej-pejic-apology

No comments:

Post a Comment